Home Contact Us
Search :

Naxalite Violence - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#2239, 20 March 2007
Naxal Attack with a Vengeance in Chhattisgarh
Devyani Srivastava
Research Officer, IPCS
Email: devyani@ipcs.org

In a trademark illustration of their 'surprise attack', the CPI-Maoists launched a major assault on a police force in Rani Bodli village of Dantewada district of Chhattisgarh in the early hours of 15 March 2007, killing at least 55 police personnel and injuring around 11. Of these, 16 were Chhattisgarh Armed Force jawans and 39 were Special Police Officers (SPOs) or members of the civil militia Salwa Judum organised by the state government in July 2005. Significantly, the Maoists have not suffered any casualty.


The killing of 39 SPOs clearly illustrates the objective of the Maoists: to slowdown efforts by the government to use the local people against them, like Salwa Judum. This was reflected in the statement issued by the outfit at the end of their 'Unity Congress' held in January-February 2007 at an undisclosed location, stating their resolve to advance the people's war throughout the country. The General Secretary of the Maoist party, Muppala Lakshman Rao Ganapathi indicated a shift in the Maoists strategy from hit and run tactics to attacking identified targets with impunity and spreading their presence further in the towns. The first manifestation of this resolve - assassination of the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha Lok Sabha MP, Sunil Kumar Mahato, on 5 March - was claimed to avenge the killing of 11 Naxalites at Lango in 2003. In the light of this incident, the triggering cause behind this attack seems to be the recent controversy surrounding the surrender policy of the Chhattisgarh government as part of its Salwa Judum campaign. On 3 January, 79 Maoists were reported to have surrendered to the Chhattisgarh police. However, even as investigations soon established these surrenders to be 'fake', reports came in that not only had the police tried to exaggerate these figures by threatening people to surrender as Naxals, but the surrendering persons were also forced to sign documents that would empower the police to enroll them as SPOs. Many examples of such controversies have engulfed the Salwa Judum campaign since its inception, which has to the fury of the Maoists against the government.


The method of the attack is significant on several counts. The Maoists, numbering around 300-400, were armed with petrol bombs and grenades, and chose to wait for the security forces to lower their guard. They surrounded the police camp between 2 and 3 am, lit the periphery with portable gensets, and set the place ablaze by lobbing grenades and petrol bombs on the barracks. Thereafter, they engaged the security men in a three hour gun battle before melting away into the deep jungles in the region, taking away the camp's armoury. Before fleeing, the Maoists laid rings of landmines around the camp, blocking reinforcements.

The meticulous execution of the attack highlights several important points: Firstly, the use of home-made petrol bombs and grenades belies reports that the extremists are possessing lethal and advanced weapons. However, it does establish their growing expertise in devising more lethal uses for their crude bombs. Secondly, the use of generator sets to light up the target area before carrying out their attack highlights their efforts to distinguish their targets, i.e. security forces and SPOs, from the local villagers. Such measures will prove crucial for sustaining local support for the Maoists, which distinguishes them from other insurgent groups like ULFA who, not long ago, had unleashed a reign of terror against innocent Hindu civilians. Thirdly, it also exhibits the ability of the Maoists to mobilize hundreds of fighters despite the large scale presence and deployment of paramilitary and anti-naxal forces. According to official reports, these include 13 battalions of the central paramilitary forces to supplement the efforts of State Police Forces, 4 India Reserve Battalions, and 17 armoured vehicles to neutralize the threats posed by IED/landmine blasts.


On the surface, the significance of this attack clearly lies in its scale, lethality and meticulous execution. At a deeper level, this act of rebellion represents a negation by the Maoists of the oppressive authority of the state on the one hand, and the intensity of the threat posed by them on the other. The resounding victory scored by the Maoist is likely to bolster their strength enormously and reverberate across the 14 Naxal affected states. It is likely to give a fillip to the ongoing battle with the security forces in Chhattisgarh, a battle that is but a small reflection of the formidable challenge represented by the Maoist threat in around 165 districts of India. While this incident certainly demands an overhaul of the state government's policy of arming one section of the society against another, it also cautions the Central government and other Naxal affected state governments to tread warily in their fight against the Naxalites.

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary

D Suba Chandran
Across the Durand Line: Who is in Control Now? Will That Change?
Taliban Talks and the Four Horsemen: Between Peace and Apocalypse
Pakistan: Talks about Talks with the Taliban, Again
Dateline Islamabad

Salma Malik
Pakistan and TTP: Dialogue or Military Action?
The Musharraf Trial & Beyond

Dateline Kabul

Mariam Safi
Afghanistan, US and the Peace Process: A Deal with the Taliban in 2014?
Dhaka Discourse

Prof Delwar Hossain
Bangladesh: Domestic Politics and External Actors
Bangladesh Post Elections 2014: Redefining Domestic Politics?

Eagle Eye

Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
US in Asia: A 'Non-Alignment' Strategy?
Indo-US Strategic Partnership Post Khobragade: The Long Shadow
East Asia Compass

Dr Sandip Mishra
North Korean Peace Gestures and Inter-Korea Relations
Japan: Implications of Indiscriminate Assertiveness
China, Japan, Korea and the US: Region at Crossroads

Himalayan Frontier

Pramod Jaiswal
Chinese Inroads to Nepal
Constituent Assembly-II: Rifts Emerging
Nepal: The Crisis over Proportional Representation and the RPP Divide
Maritime Matters

Vijay Sakhuja
Increasing Maritime Competition: IORA, IONS, Milan and the Indian Ocean Networks
China in the Indian Ocean: Deep Sea Forays
Iran Navy: Developing Long Sea Legs

Middle Kingdom

DS Rajan
China in the Indian Ocean: Competing Priorities
China-Japan Friction: How can India Respond?
Nuke Street

Amb Sheelkant Sharma
Nuclear Security Summit 2014 and the NTI Index
Nuclear Power: An Annual Report Card

Red Affairs

Bibhu Prasad
Maoists in the Northeast: Reality and Myth-Making
Surrender of Gudsa Usendi: Ominous beginning for the Naxals?
South Asian Dialectic

PR Chari
Federalism: Centre as Coordinator and Adjudicator
Limits of Federalism

Spotlight West Asia

Amb Ranjit Gupta
Saudi Arabia-US Estrangement: Implications for the Indian Subcontinent
Syria Today: Is Regime Change the Answer?
The Arab World: Trying Times Ahead
Strategic Space

Manpreet Sethi
US, China and the South Asian Nuclear Construct
Responding to Pakistan’s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: A Strategy for India

The Strategist

Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Strategic Non-Nuclear Weapons: An Essential Consort to a Doctrine of No First Use

OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee


Browse by Publications

Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Naxalite Violence 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
On Maoist Killings

Review of Chief Ministers' Conference on Naxalism

Maoist Violence and its Limitations

Naxal Attack in Gadchiroli: A Sign of Strength or Weakness?

Policy Options on Pakistan: What India Should Do

Elections in Maoist Heartland

Emerging Trends of Urban Terrorism

Fighting Naxals

Q&A: Terror Tentacles in Karnataka

Q&A: Karzai Threatens Pakistan

Q&A: Attack on Danish Embassy in Islamabad

Mining War in Chhattisgarh

Nayagarh Attack: Maoist Penetration in Orissa

The Swat Offensive

Web of Violence in Jharkhand

Naxals-LTTE nexus in Tamil Nadu: An Alliance in the Making?

Economic Blockade: Will the Maoists' New Strategy Succeed?

The Gorakhpur Blasts: Symptom of a Rising Threat

Suicide Terrorism - Iraq 2006

Y! MyWeb
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2014
 January  February  March  April  May  June  July  August
 2013  2012  2011  2010  2009  2008  2007  2006
 2005  2004  2003  2002  2001  2000  1999  1998

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map | IPCS Email
B 7/3 Lower Ground Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029, INDIA.
Tel: 91-11-4100 1900, 4165 2556, 4165 2557, 4165 2558, 4165 2559 Fax: (91-11) 41652560
© Copyright 2014, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.
        Web Design by http://www.indiainternets.com