Home Contact Us
Search :

Naxalite Violence - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#1021, 26 April 2003
Jharkhand: Anti-Naxal Strategy and Use of POTA
Sanjay K Jha
Institute for Conflict Management

The recent controversy over the alleged misuse of Prevention of Terrorism Act (POTA) in Jharkhand has raised some fundamental questions regarding the counter-Naxal strategy adopted by the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government in the worst Naxal-affected states of India; POTA had been used in an ad hoc manner and not as part of a comprehensive strategy to deal with left-wing extremism.

A team of civil society activists toured six districts of Jharkhand between January 29 and February 3, 2003 and concluded, “all the laws of the land are replaced by POTA.†According to their finding, a total of 654 persons had cases against them filed under POTA, 202 persons, including approximately ten minors, had been arrested, and nearly 3,200 persons had been named under POTA. The social profile of most of those arrested show that they are either farmers, students or daily wagers. A majority of them were booked because they either had provided the Naxalites with food or possessed Naxal literature.  In contrast to the huge number of arrests under POTA in Jharkhand, only 100 persons were arrested and 400 accused under POTA in Jammu and Kashmir; in Andhra Pradesh, another State affected by left-wing extremism, an estimated 40 persons have were booked under POTA.

The Jharkhand government, after a lot of criticism and pressure from the Union government, was forced review all cases under POTA and subsequently decided to withdraw cases against 83 persons. The entire episode highlights the fact that the government, since the creation of the State in November 2001, has relied on excessive use of force to deal with the Naxalites, particularly the Maoist Communist Centre (MCC) and the People’s War Group (PWG). In fact, POTA was the major component of the new government’s policy for its vigorous anti-Naxalite operations.  Insufficient attention was paid to critical issues that sustain the Naxalite groups including their social roots, their support structure, their financial network, the preparedness of the police force and performance of institutions of civil governance in these areas. Consequently, the government’s anti-Naxal drive, despite large scale use of police and paramilitary forces, could not yield desired results and the Naxal groups have expanded their influence and started using Jharkhand as an important base to achieve their larger goal of unification of Maoist movements in the country and across South Asia.

Currently, Jharkhand is the State worst affected by left wing extremism. In 2002, a total of 156 persons were killed due to Naxal violence in the State. About 16 districts, out of the total 22 in the State, are Naxalite affected; the worst affected districts are Chatra, Palamu, Garhwa, Giridih, Latehar, Gumla, Ranchi, Hazaribagh, Lohardaga and Bokaro, and the Naxalites virtually run a parallel government in many areas of these districts. The dense forest terrain of Jharkhand coupled with poor performance of its governing institutions, particularly in the remote tribal areas provides a fertile ground for the Naxal activities.

The spread and growth of left-wing extremism, especially in states like Jharkhand, cannot be explained only in terms of law and order. There exists a deep rooted sense of neglect among the tribals. Prior to the creation of Jharkhand, the feeling was that the region was backward because of the the political and bureaucratic establishment, which was dominated by officials from 'non-tribal' areas of Bihar who did not care for the tribals. It was hoped that the new government, being more representative, would be better disposed to address the legitimate grievances of the tribals. Unfortunately, the NDA government failed to revitalize the institutions of governance in Naxalite affected areas. Conversely, it appears that the creation of Jharkhand has helped the MCC and PWG consolidate their roots in the region, considering the potential for extortion from contractors, traders and industrial units has increased with the creation of the new State. According to independent assessments, in Jharkhand, the Naxal groups have a whopping annual income of about Rs 100 crores (US$ 22 million) derived mostly through levy on mining, coal and kendu leaf trading besides hefty ransoms, levies and percentage from government officials.

Therefore, apart from effective policing, any strategy to deal with Naxalism in Jharkhand needs to take into account the efficiency and effectiveness of the institutions of civil governance and development in the State. There is also a need to assess and neutralize the dynamics of the thriving underground economy and parallel structures of 'governance' that the extremists have installed in their areas of influence.

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary

D Suba Chandran
Across the Durand Line: Who is in Control Now? Will That Change?
Taliban Talks and the Four Horsemen: Between Peace and Apocalypse
Pakistan: Talks about Talks with the Taliban, Again
Dateline Islamabad

Salma Malik
Pakistan and TTP: Dialogue or Military Action?
The Musharraf Trial & Beyond

Dateline Kabul

Mariam Safi
Afghanistan, US and the Peace Process: A Deal with the Taliban in 2014?
Dhaka Discourse

Prof Delwar Hossain
Bangladesh: Domestic Politics and External Actors
Bangladesh Post Elections 2014: Redefining Domestic Politics?

Eagle Eye

Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
US in Asia: A 'Non-Alignment' Strategy?
Indo-US Strategic Partnership Post Khobragade: The Long Shadow
East Asia Compass

Dr Sandip Mishra
North Korean Peace Gestures and Inter-Korea Relations
Japan: Implications of Indiscriminate Assertiveness
China, Japan, Korea and the US: Region at Crossroads

Himalayan Frontier

Pramod Jaiswal
Chinese Inroads to Nepal
Constituent Assembly-II: Rifts Emerging
Nepal: The Crisis over Proportional Representation and the RPP Divide
Maritime Matters

Vijay Sakhuja
Increasing Maritime Competition: IORA, IONS, Milan and the Indian Ocean Networks
China in the Indian Ocean: Deep Sea Forays
Iran Navy: Developing Long Sea Legs

Middle Kingdom

DS Rajan
China in the Indian Ocean: Competing Priorities
China-Japan Friction: How can India Respond?
Nuke Street

Amb Sheelkant Sharma
Nuclear Security Summit 2014 and the NTI Index
Nuclear Power: An Annual Report Card

Red Affairs

Bibhu Prasad
Maoists in the Northeast: Reality and Myth-Making
Surrender of Gudsa Usendi: Ominous beginning for the Naxals?
South Asian Dialectic

PR Chari
Federalism: Centre as Coordinator and Adjudicator
Limits of Federalism

Spotlight West Asia

Amb Ranjit Gupta
Saudi Arabia-US Estrangement: Implications for the Indian Subcontinent
Syria Today: Is Regime Change the Answer?
The Arab World: Trying Times Ahead
Strategic Space

Manpreet Sethi
US, China and the South Asian Nuclear Construct
Responding to Pakistan’s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: A Strategy for India

The Strategist

Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Strategic Non-Nuclear Weapons: An Essential Consort to a Doctrine of No First Use

OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee


Browse by Publications

Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Naxalite Violence 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
Naxal Violence: Prospects for Peace Process in Andhra Pradesh

Maoist Linkages with Northeast Insurgents: Growing Concerns

Naxal Assault: Growing Vulnerability of Bihar Police

Counter-Insurgency Operations: Use of the CRPF

MCC and Maoists: Expanding Naxal Violence in Bihar

Y! MyWeb
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2014
 January  February  March  April  May  June  July  August
 2013  2012  2011  2010  2009  2008  2007  2006
 2005  2004  2003  2002  2001  2000  1999  1998

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map | IPCS Email
B 7/3 Lower Ground Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029, INDIA.
Tel: 91-11-4100 1900, 4165 2556, 4165 2557, 4165 2558, 4165 2559 Fax: (91-11) 41652560
© Copyright 2014, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.
        Web Design by http://www.indiainternets.com