Home Contact Us  

Naxalite Violence - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#1021, 26 April 2003
Jharkhand: Anti-Naxal Strategy and Use of POTA
Sanjay K Jha
Institute for Conflict Management

The recent controversy over the alleged misuse of Prevention of Terrorism Act (POTA) in Jharkhand has raised some fundamental questions regarding the counter-Naxal strategy adopted by the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government in the worst Naxal-affected states of India; POTA had been used in an ad hoc manner and not as part of a comprehensive strategy to deal with left-wing extremism.

A team of civil society activists toured six districts of Jharkhand between January 29 and February 3, 2003 and concluded, “all the laws of the land are replaced by POTA.†According to their finding, a total of 654 persons had cases against them filed under POTA, 202 persons, including approximately ten minors, had been arrested, and nearly 3,200 persons had been named under POTA. The social profile of most of those arrested show that they are either farmers, students or daily wagers. A majority of them were booked because they either had provided the Naxalites with food or possessed Naxal literature.  In contrast to the huge number of arrests under POTA in Jharkhand, only 100 persons were arrested and 400 accused under POTA in Jammu and Kashmir; in Andhra Pradesh, another State affected by left-wing extremism, an estimated 40 persons have were booked under POTA.

The Jharkhand government, after a lot of criticism and pressure from the Union government, was forced review all cases under POTA and subsequently decided to withdraw cases against 83 persons. The entire episode highlights the fact that the government, since the creation of the State in November 2001, has relied on excessive use of force to deal with the Naxalites, particularly the Maoist Communist Centre (MCC) and the People’s War Group (PWG). In fact, POTA was the major component of the new government’s policy for its vigorous anti-Naxalite operations.  Insufficient attention was paid to critical issues that sustain the Naxalite groups including their social roots, their support structure, their financial network, the preparedness of the police force and performance of institutions of civil governance in these areas. Consequently, the government’s anti-Naxal drive, despite large scale use of police and paramilitary forces, could not yield desired results and the Naxal groups have expanded their influence and started using Jharkhand as an important base to achieve their larger goal of unification of Maoist movements in the country and across South Asia.

Currently, Jharkhand is the State worst affected by left wing extremism. In 2002, a total of 156 persons were killed due to Naxal violence in the State. About 16 districts, out of the total 22 in the State, are Naxalite affected; the worst affected districts are Chatra, Palamu, Garhwa, Giridih, Latehar, Gumla, Ranchi, Hazaribagh, Lohardaga and Bokaro, and the Naxalites virtually run a parallel government in many areas of these districts. The dense forest terrain of Jharkhand coupled with poor performance of its governing institutions, particularly in the remote tribal areas provides a fertile ground for the Naxal activities.

The spread and growth of left-wing extremism, especially in states like Jharkhand, cannot be explained only in terms of law and order. There exists a deep rooted sense of neglect among the tribals. Prior to the creation of Jharkhand, the feeling was that the region was backward because of the the political and bureaucratic establishment, which was dominated by officials from 'non-tribal' areas of Bihar who did not care for the tribals. It was hoped that the new government, being more representative, would be better disposed to address the legitimate grievances of the tribals. Unfortunately, the NDA government failed to revitalize the institutions of governance in Naxalite affected areas. Conversely, it appears that the creation of Jharkhand has helped the MCC and PWG consolidate their roots in the region, considering the potential for extortion from contractors, traders and industrial units has increased with the creation of the new State. According to independent assessments, in Jharkhand, the Naxal groups have a whopping annual income of about Rs 100 crores (US$ 22 million) derived mostly through levy on mining, coal and kendu leaf trading besides hefty ransoms, levies and percentage from government officials.

Therefore, apart from effective policing, any strategy to deal with Naxalism in Jharkhand needs to take into account the efficiency and effectiveness of the institutions of civil governance and development in the State. There is also a need to assess and neutralize the dynamics of the thriving underground economy and parallel structures of 'governance' that the extremists have installed in their areas of influence.

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary
D Suba Chandran
Resetting Kabul-Islamabad Relations: Three Key Issues
Can Pakistan Reset its Relations with Afghanistan?
The New Afghanistan: Four Major Challenges for President Ghani
Big Picture
Prof Varun Sahni
Understanding Democracy and Diversity in J&K
When Xi Met Modi: Juxtaposing China and India
Pakistan?s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: The Inevitability of Instability

Dateline Colombo

Asanga Abeyagoonasekera.
Sri Lanka: Moving Towards a Higher Collective Outcome
The Importance of Electing the Best to our Nation's Parliament
Sri Lanka: Toward a Diaspora Re-Engagement Plan
Dateline Islamabad
Salma Malik
Pakistan's Hurt Locker: What Next?
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
India-Pakistan Relations in 2015: Through a Looking Glass
Dhaka Discourse
Prof Delwar Hossain
IPCS Forecast: Bangladesh in 2015
18th SAARC Summit: A Perspective from Bangladesh
Bangladesh in Global Forums: Diplomacy vs. Domestic Politics
Eagle Eye
Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
India-US: Significance of the Second Modi-Obama Meet
Has President Obama Turned Lame Duck?
Modi-Obama Summit: Criticism for Criticism?s Sake?

East Asia Compass
Dr Sandip Mishra
India-Japan-US Trilateral: India?s Policy for the Indo-Pacific
China-South Korea Ties: Implications for the US Pivot to Asia
Many ?Pivots to Asia?: What Does It Mean For Regional Stability?
Himalayan Frontier
Pramod Jaiswal
Nepal?s New Constitution: Instrument towards Peace or Catalyst to Conflict?
IPCS Forecast: Nepal in 2015
Constitution-making: Will Nepal Miss its Second Deadline?

Prof Shankari Sundararaman
IPCS Forecast: Southeast Asia in 2015
Indonesia's Pacific Identity: What Jakarta Must Do in West Papua
Modi in Myanmar: From ?Look East? to ?Act East?
Sushant Sareen
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
Islamic State: Prospects in Pakistan
Pakistan: The Futility of Internationalising Kashmir

Looking East
Wasbir Hussain
Myanmar in New Delhi's Naga Riddle
China: ?Peaceful? Display of Military Might
Naga Peace Accord: Need to Reserve Euphoria
Maritime Matters
Vijay Sakhuja
Indian Ocean: Modi on a Maritime Pilgrimage
Indian Ocean: Exploring Maritime Domain Awareness
IPCS Forecast: The Indian Ocean in 2015

Nuke Street
Amb Sheelkant Sharma
US-Russia and Global Nuclear Security: Under a Frosty Spell?
India's Nuclear Capable Cruise Missile: The Nirbhay Test
India-Australia Nuclear Agreement: Bespeaking of a New Age
Red Affairs
Bibhu Prasad
Countering Left Wing Extremism: Failures within Successes
Return of the Native: CPI-Maoist in Kerala
The Rising Civilian Costs of the State-Vs-Extremists Conflict

Regional Economy
Amita Batra
India and the APEC
IPCS Forecast: South Asian Regional Integration
South Asia: Rupee Regionalisation and Intra-regional Trade Enhancement
South Asian Dialectic
PR Chari
Resuming the Indo-Pak Dialogue: Evolving a New Focus
Defence Management in India: An Agenda for Parrikar
Pakistani Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan: Implications for Asian Security

Spotlight West Asia
Amb Ranjit Gupta
Prime Minister Modi Finally Begins His Interaction with West Asia*
A Potential Indian Role in West Asia?
US-GCC Summit: More Hype than Substance
Strategic Space
Manpreet Sethi
India-Russia Nuclear Vision Statement: See that it Delivers
Global Nuclear Disarmament: The Humanitarian Consequences Route
Nasr: Dangers of Pakistan's Short Range Ballistic Missile

The Strategist
Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Jihadi Aggression and Nuclear Deterrence
The Blight of Ambiguity
Falun Gong: The Fear Within

OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee


Browse by Publications

Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Naxalite Violence 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
Naxal Violence: Prospects for Peace Process in Andhra Pradesh

Maoist Linkages with Northeast Insurgents: Growing Concerns

Naxal Assault: Growing Vulnerability of Bihar Police

Counter-Insurgency Operations: Use of the CRPF

MCC and Maoists: Expanding Naxal Violence in Bihar

Y! MyWeb
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2017
 January  February  March  April  May  June  July  August  September  October  November  December
 2016  2015  2014  2013  2012  2011  2010  2009
 2008  2007  2006  2005  2004  2003  2002  2001
 2000  1999  1998  1997

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
18, Link Road, Jungpura Extension, New Delhi 110014, INDIA.

Tel: 91-11-4100-1902    Email: officemail@ipcs.org

© Copyright 2017, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.