Home Contact Us
Search :
   

Indo-Pak - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#1442, 27 July 2004
 
SAARC Should Stay Clear Of Bilateral Issues
Mukul Kumar
Freelancer
 

The bonhomie created by the 12th SAARC (South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation) summit has been further boosted by the recent decision to hold the 13th SAARC summit in Bangladesh in January next year. Though SAARC does not have much achievement to boast of in its existence of nearly two decades, the organization now appears to be overcoming some of the pitfalls. This optimism probably encouraged the SAARC foreign ministers' meeting in Islamabad to confer the first ever SAARC Award on late president Ziaur Rahman in recognition of his vision and initiative for the establishment of this regional entity. However, the Pakistani attempt to include bilateral issues on SAARC agenda threatened to upset the applecart of SAARC.

 

When SAARC was formed nearly two decades ago, not many people were optimistic about it. Skeptics wrote it off as a talking shop, having nothing more to do than hold meetings, some of which did not always eventuate. In the nearly twenty years of existence of SAARC, the January 2005 Summit will be only the thirteenth. Indo-Pakistan rivalry always loomed large over SAARC and some of the summit meetings were postponed because of this. But, despite a number of pitfalls, SAARC has managed to survive.

 

SAARC has also been criticized for non-perfomnce in comparison to other regional organisations like the ASEAN. SAARC does not in any way bear comparison with ASEAN because of certain fundamental differences between these two organisations. It must be borne in mind that ASEAN's birth was motivated by extra regional compulsions, wherein there was a definite perception of regional threat. There also was external input in the security perceptions of the ASEAN states. The threat came to be defined both in terms of ideology as well as in substantive physical terms. Moreover, unlike in SAARC, there was a modicum of symmetry in ASEAN.

 

Fortunately for SAARC, need for physical security of the South Asian states had very little, if at all, to do with the conceptualisation of the regional body. In fact, the concept behind SAARC was 'collective self-reliance'. The motivations were internally generated which makes the need for its success all the more imperative. But the state of India-Pakistan relations regrettably stunted the momentum of SAARC.

 

Also, the fact that three of the countries of SAARC were a single political entity not so long ago, with shared history and values, combined with some sad experiences has had much to do with the wariness in their relationship that in turn affected performance of the Association. While some of the less confident wondered at the efficacy of an organisation composed of the poorest of the global indigents, SAARC's founding fathers put their confidence in the Association on their belief that even poverty, when shared, becomes more endurable.

 

While it is futile to blame any one member for less than satisfactory performance of SAARC, it would be worthwhile for our policy makers to delve into the reasons for our inability to exploit the full potentials of the regional organisation in the last twenty years. Obviously, SAARC could not gather momentum because of Indo-Pakistan rivalry. However, things changed considerably after the 12th SAARC Summit. The SAARC heads of state summit seven months earlier, also in Islamabad, was the setting for a breakthrough agreement between Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf and then Indian premier Atal Behari Vajpayee to resume talks after a 30-month hiatus and the 2002 confrontation that almost erupted into their fourth war.

 

Pakistan's Foreign Minister Khurshid Mahmud Kasuri said in his opening address to 25th Council of Ministers meeting, "SAARC has started to exude new confidence and its international profile has enhanced." It would be retrograde to involve this organization into discussing bilateral issues. There is a need to keep the organization functioning free from troubles. SAARC has already considerably widened its agenda. By bringing bilateral issues it will only complicate the present working of the organization. It will take away whatever dynamism the organization has managed to infuse in itself.

 

The Pakistani proposal to review the SAARC Charter could have only proved counter-productive. The bilateral issues can be discussed by holding bilateral meetings on the sidelines as is the practice at present. If the bilateral issues are brought on the SAARC agenda, it will once again bog down the organization in unnecessary squabbling.

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary

D Suba Chandran
Across the Durand Line: Who is in Control Now? Will That Change?
Taliban Talks and the Four Horsemen: Between Peace and Apocalypse
Pakistan: Talks about Talks with the Taliban, Again
Dateline Islamabad

Salma Malik
Pakistan and TTP: Dialogue or Military Action?
The Musharraf Trial & Beyond

Dateline Kabul

Mariam Safi
Afghanistan, US and the Peace Process: A Deal with the Taliban in 2014?
Dhaka Discourse

Prof Delwar Hossain
Bangladesh: Domestic Politics and External Actors
Bangladesh Post Elections 2014: Redefining Domestic Politics?

Eagle Eye

Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
US in Asia: A 'Non-Alignment' Strategy?
Indo-US Strategic Partnership Post Khobragade: The Long Shadow
East Asia Compass

Dr Sandip Mishra
North Korean Peace Gestures and Inter-Korea Relations
Japan: Implications of Indiscriminate Assertiveness
China, Japan, Korea and the US: Region at Crossroads

Himalayan Frontier

Pramod Jaiswal
Chinese Inroads to Nepal
Constituent Assembly-II: Rifts Emerging
Nepal: The Crisis over Proportional Representation and the RPP Divide
Maritime Matters

Vijay Sakhuja
Increasing Maritime Competition: IORA, IONS, Milan and the Indian Ocean Networks
China in the Indian Ocean: Deep Sea Forays
Iran Navy: Developing Long Sea Legs

Middle Kingdom

DS Rajan
China in the Indian Ocean: Competing Priorities
China-Japan Friction: How can India Respond?
Nuke Street

Amb Sheelkant Sharma
Nuclear Security Summit 2014 and the NTI Index
Nuclear Power: An Annual Report Card

Red Affairs

Bibhu Prasad
Maoists in the Northeast: Reality and Myth-Making
Surrender of Gudsa Usendi: Ominous beginning for the Naxals?
South Asian Dialectic

PR Chari
Federalism: Centre as Coordinator and Adjudicator
Limits of Federalism

Spotlight West Asia

Amb Ranjit Gupta
Saudi Arabia-US Estrangement: Implications for the Indian Subcontinent
Syria Today: Is Regime Change the Answer?
The Arab World: Trying Times Ahead
Strategic Space

Manpreet Sethi
US, China and the South Asian Nuclear Construct
Responding to Pakistan’s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: A Strategy for India

The Strategist

Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Strategic Non-Nuclear Weapons: An Essential Consort to a Doctrine of No First Use
 

OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee


 

Browse by Publications

Commentaries 
Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 
China 
Myanmar 
Afghanistan 
Iran 
Pakistan 
India 
J&K  

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Indo-Pak 
Military 
Terrorism 
Naxalite Violence 
Nuclear 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
Merger of Naxal Groups: Threat or Opportunity

'Doctors' take Drug Trafficking to New Areas in Eastern India

Asia Cooperation Dialogue (ACD): An Endeavour for Solving Common Problems

The New Silk Route

One Year of the Iraq War: US Unilateralism Fails to Bring Desired Results

ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
Facebook
 
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2014
 January  February  March  April  May  June  July  August
 2013  2012  2011  2010  2009  2008  2007  2006
 2005  2004  2003  2002  2001  2000  1999  1998
 1997
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map | IPCS Email
B 7/3 Lower Ground Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029, INDIA.
Tel: 91-11-4100 1900, 4165 2556, 4165 2557, 4165 2558, 4165 2559 Fax: (91-11) 41652560
Email:
© Copyright 2014, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.
        Web Design by http://www.indiainternets.com