India
Alternative Development and Manipur's 'War on Drugs': Need for a Broader Framework
31 Jan, 2019 · 5552
Anjali Gupta argues why the objectives of Manipur’s 'War on Drugs' and alternative development plan can be comprehensively achieved only through a holistic approach, whose implementation strategy takes the state’s internal complexities into account.
In Manipur, the cultivation of illicit crops such as cannabis and opium
has remained a major source of income, especially for low-income agrarian groups.
After announcing a ‘War on Drugs’, incumbent Chief Minister, N Biren Singh, proposed cultivation
of lemongrass and agar trees as
an alternative crop, while outlining an
alternative development (AD) plan for the state. The AD plan envisions promoting
alternative livelihoods, the strategy for which includes eradication of illicit
crop cultivation through crop replacement.
For
the AD plan to achieve its objectives, the implementation strategy will need to
become more broad-based and include addressing other internal complexities in
the state within its ambit.
Prior Conditioning
Across
the world, the provision of alternative livelihoods (including
via crop replacement) is a form of incentives offered to
farmers to encourage switching from cultivating illicit crops to licit crops. The broader objective of providing
alternative livelihoods is to address the structural and institutional factors
that inform the choices of farmers cultivating illicit crops. Within this
framework, crop replacement is a
strategy aimed at reducing the farmer's reliance on illicit crops to earn a living. In this regard, there has been widespread
criticism
of strategies involving a de-coupling of the destruction of illicit crops and
provision of alternative crops/livelihoods by making the latter conditional on
the former due to the practical inadequacies it brings about.
To
illustrate, the 2015 World
Drug Report argued that illicit crop cultivation is interwoven with other issues that go “well
beyond the microeconomics and agronomy of coca, opium poppy and cannabis
cultivation.” Given the complexities of the ground reality
in Manipur, conditioning the provision of alternative livelihood options on prior
eradication of the illicit crops, might hinder the core objective of Singh’s ‘War
on Drugs’.
Beyond Agronomics
In
Manipur, an average farmer whose relies on low-effort, high-yield
crops like cannabis and opium cultivation
for his/her livelihood earns approximately INR 700/- and INR 25,000/- per kilogram
respectively. This figure is slightly more or equal to the sum a farmer can
earn by cultivating coffee or rubber. In a 2014 “approach
paper” towards the implementation of the New Land Use Policy, the Manipur
government’s Planning Department proposed coffee and rubber (conventionally
recommended alternative crops also often referred to as “peace products” by
the UN Office on Drugs and Crime), among others, as crop alternatives.
There
is evidence
that suggests that though farmers in Manipur have been willing switch to
cultivating licit crops, they tend to continue cultivating illicit crops even
in the face of associated problems such as price fluctuations,
violence by traffickers, and the expenses involved in crop protection and
corruption. This state-of-affairs
can be attributed to infrastructural under-development in the state. If this
aspect is left unaddressed, shortcomings in essential infrastructure and markets
to cultivate and trade in such “peace products” might continue to afflict the
fates of other alternatives as well, including lemongrass and agar trees that
Singh has proposed.
Moreover,
regions where illicit crops are cultivated often experience a ‘ballooning
effect’, wherein the demand for illicit crops from a region is met by the
supply of illicit crops cultivated elsewhere. This takes
place in areas where alternative livelihood plans are conditioned and development
is fragmented.
The
focus of Singh's AD plan, especially the alternative livelihoods component is restricted
to farmers affected by eradication of illicit crops and does not encompass all the
farmers in the state. Manipur’s farmers require an organised agricultural framework
complete with provision of subsidised seeds, pesticides, storage facilities,
credit, and transportation, as well as markets to export their produce. To
avoid a repeat of past failures, AD programmes should focus on the overall development
of the entire state, not just sections affected by eradication of illicit crop cultivation.
Internal Complexities
In
Manipur, prevalent conflict and corruption complicate initiatives aimed at
providing alternative livelihood. Moreover, the nexus between ethnic rebel groups
and drug mafias across the India-Myanmar border has been deepening in recent
times. Reports
suggest that the National Socialist Council of Nagaland-Khaplang (NSCN-K), the United
Liberation Front of Assam (ULFA) and the Kamatapur
Liberation Organization (KLO) have been “carrying out opium cultivation and
trade in Kachin Province of Myanmar.” According to Subir Bhaumik, though some
insurgent groups operating in Manipur resist drug traffickers, others like NSCN-Isak
Muivah (which too once “abhorred” drug trade and threatened smugglers with dire
consequences) are encouraging farmers to cultivate poppy by offering economic
incentives and in other cases, through force. Additionally, tentacles of the
narco-economy in Manipur also extend deep into the state’s bureaucracy. In 2018
alone, several public
officials in the state were arrested after large caches of narcotics were found
in their possession during raids.
Looking Ahead
For
any AD model to be successful in such a complex environment, the enforcement strategy
should employ a comprehensive approach. Relevant initiatives should not be
limited by pursuits such as destruction of illicit crops as pre-conditions to crop
replacement activities. Instead, they should focus on a holistic development of
the state, by factoring in aspects like infrastructure, good governance, and law
and order. Siloised development, which ignores Manipur’s internal complexities,
could hinder the AD plan’s progress.
The
focus on encouraging alternative livelihoods should be part of a broad-based AD
plan that envisions the development of the entire state. Economic factors do play a key role in defining AD
plans. However, on the issue of addressing illicit crop cultivation, the
plan and its corresponding implementation strategy will also need to consider
factors that go beyond agronomics. Efforts to eradicate illicit crop
cultivation and provision of alternative livelihood options, including through crop
replacements, pursued simultaneously. The objectives of Manipur’s AD plan can be
comprehensively achieved only if it takes a holistic approach, and its implementation
strategy takes the state’s internal complexities into account.