Maritime Matters
Indian Navy: Time to Expand the Geographical Scope of Mission Based Deployments
10 Nov, 2020 · 5739
Dr. Vijay Sakhuja argues that the Indian Navy must expand Mission Based Deployments into the western Pacific
The
Indian Navy has added a new acronym—TIDE—to its lexicon, which stands for
Trust; Interoperability; Domain Awareness; and Enhanced Engagements. In his online address, titled “SAGAR - Charting
India’s Maritime Security,” to the National Defence
College, India’s Navy Chief, Adm Karambir Singh, emphasised that TIDE is
closely linked with Indian Prime Minister Narendera Modi’s vision of Security
and Growth for All in the Region (SAGAR), an initiative that was announced five
years ago in Mauritius.
Adm
Singh also alluded to the Indian Navy’s three ‘Lines of Effort’: (a) collaboration
and cooperation (b) enhancing positive influence in the region, and (c) enhancing
reach and sustenance in the farthest corners of India’s areas of interest,
which resonate with “like-minded maritime nations, and are focused towards
pursuance of our overall national and regional maritime objectives.” However,
in the same breath, ostensibly referring to China, he was unequivocal that the "global
commons" could emerge as "contested seas" threatening free flow of commerce and
trade. Addressing this, he argued, necessitates a “pragmatic and
outcome based strategy, rather than a purely conceptual.”
Although
it is fashionable for militaries to coin acronyms for long or complex
formulations for use in their day-to-day operational and administrative functioning,
Adm Singh’s acronym, TIDE, embeds three important security discourses—cooperative,
convergent, and competitive. These are also echoed in India’s
politico-diplomatic thinking and strategic decision-making.
The ‘cooperative’
discourse is led by SAGAR, which motivates states to “conserve and sustainably use the
maritime domain, and to make meaningful efforts to create a safe, secure and
stable maritime domain.” Its primary focus is on the Indian Ocean, in which
India is an important player and has been labelled as a ‘net security
provider’. Its contribution to regional grouping such as the Indian Ocean Rim Association
(IORA), Indian Ocean
Commission (IOC), Djibouti
Code of Conduct, Indian Ocean Naval
Symposium (IONS) etc is worth mentioning.
The ‘convergent’
security discourse is the Indo-Pacific Oceans Initiative (IPOI), flagged by Prime Minister Modi at the November
2019 East Asia Summit in Bangkok. It is an ‘open global initiative’ and draws on “existing regional
cooperation architecture and mechanisms to focus on seven central pillars
conceived around Maritime Security; Maritime Ecology; Maritime Resources;
Capacity Building and Resource Sharing; Disaster Risk Reduction and Management;
Science, Technology and Academic Cooperation; and Trade Connectivity and
Maritime Transport.” These are to be achieved by creating partnerships with
interested countries. Significantly, India’s vision of the IPOI resonates with Japan’s Free and Open Indo-Pacific, which envisages combining two continents (Asia and Africa)
and two oceans (Pacific Ocean and Indian Ocean); and the ASEAN Outlook on Indo-Pacific, which seeks cooperation in a
broad range of areas of maritime collaboration, connectivity, UN Sustainable
Development Goals 2030, economy etc.
TIDE’s ‘competitive’
discourse is reflected in the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (QSD) that is associated
with the Malabar series of naval exercises, involving India, Japan and the US, and which now includes Australia. These fit into New Delhi’s broad understanding
of the Indo-Pacific that is centered on China albeit with varying
interpretations. Undeniably, the Indo-Pacific is an arena of a power shift
(relative and real) and has a
bearing on the global security order.
There
is ample evidence of competitive security at play in the Indo-Pacific. In
particular, the western Pacific
Ocean has emerged as the centre of gravity for naval presence, aggressive
posturing and maritime/naval infrastructure
development. The US has announced the Pacific
Deterrence Initiative; conducted unprecedented multi-carrier operations; and relentlessly undertaken Freedom of Navigation Operations in the South China Sea (SCS).
China’s navy has responded in equal measure such as by carrier operations;
simultaneous naval-air drills in different sea areas; launching DF series ballistic
missiles (carrier killers) in the
SCS; and militarily intimidating Taiwan. The Australian and Japanese Navies have conducted high end naval exercises. The French Navy too is
proactively engaged in multilateral naval exercises; the Canadian Navy is
making its presence in the region; the British Royal Navy has plans for long
deployment in the region by its new carrier; and it would not be surprising to
see the German Navy in the region in the coming future.
Since June 2017, the Indian Navy has engaged in Mission Based Deployments (MBD) for enhanced Maritime Domain Awareness, and
its warships, submarines and aircraft have been deployed in the Indian
Ocean on near continuous basis for
Presence and Surveillance Missions off critical choke points/sea lanes. It is fair to argue that the future of Indo-Pacific security will be
determined in the western Pacific. The Indian Navy is not new to the western
Pacific given that it has conducted the Malabar naval exercises in the region
(off Guam and the Sea of Japan). The MBDs must avoid being labelled as the proverbial
‘frog in the well’ and expand into the western Pacific.
Dr
Vijay Sakhuja is a former director of the National Maritime Foundation, New Delhi.