India & Southeast Asia
India-Indonesia: A Natural Partnership for the Indo-Pacific
16 Jan, 2019 · 5547
Ashutosh Nagda traces the emerging depth in the convergence between the Indian and Indonesian visions for the Indo-Pacific, and argues that a partnership between the two is a natural one that must be nurtured further
During his May 2018 visit to India, Indonesia’s Co-ordinating
Minister for Maritime Affairs, Luhut Panjaitan, laid emphasis on a closer
cooperation between India and Indonesia, suggesting it to be “important for
balance of power in the region.” For India, which is looking to deepen its engagement
in Southeast Asia to emerge as a regional power, Indonesia’s forthcoming
gesture is a good sign, and a stronger partnership with Jakarta would be in New
Delhi’s interest.
Indonesia's
Evolving Foreign Policy
As the world's largest archipelagic country and Southeast
Asia's biggest economy, Indonesia has demonstrated an intent to play a leading
role in the Indo-Pacific framework—a running theme in the policies of its current
and previous administrations. Indonesia’s former President, Susilo Yudhoyono,
advocated a policy of “thousand friends, zero enemies.” The main strategy of
the government, as referred to by its then Foreign Minister, Marty Natalegawa,
was that of achieving “dynamic equilibrium.” The core objective of this
strategy is to create and maintain a system that builds trust between all involved
parties and mutually agreed norms to ensure that no sole actor dominates the
rest. This is the strategy Indonesia is currently employing to balance the US-China
rivalry in the region.
For instance, at present, Jakarta’s foreign policy is
anchored in Indonesia’s Global Maritime Fulcrum (GMF) doctrine, one that incumbent
President Joko Widodo announced in 2014. The doctrine envisions increasing Indonesia’s
interconnectedness by decreasing the development gap between the main and outer
islands. It also envisions the Indonesian navy as a strong actor in the region’s
maritime domain. Indonesia's attempt, as explained by its incumbent Foreign
Minister, Retno Marsudi, to “turn geopolitical competition into collaboration,”
reflects the continuation of Yudhoyono's strategy of “dynamic equilibrium.”
Overall, this policy of achieving a balanced and
cooperative Indo-pacific region has opened doors for collaboration between various
actors in the region. For instance, in New Delhi’s attempts to enhance its
position as a regional power, Jakarta has found consonance for its policy of dynamic
equilibrium.
India’s Policy
for the Indo-Pacific
Since 2014, India has placed a heavy emphasis on its
‘Act East Policy’ to play a proactive role in Southeast Asia. Given the increasing
strategic significance of the seas in the backdrop of China’s increasing
inroads into Southeast Asia, cooperation on maritime issues between India and the regional Indian Ocean littoral states has
witnessed an upswing.
To illustrate, New Delhi has consistently advocated
for a cooperative, secure and stable Indo-Pacific to foster collective growth
and prosperity in the region. In his keynote address at the 2018 Shangri La
dialogue, India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi outlined New Delhi’s vision for
the Indo-Pacific as “a common rules-based order,” and not as “a club of limited
members” or a “grouping that seeks to dominate” or corner any one country. In
the same address, Modi explained India's vision of ‘Security and Growth for all
in the Region’ (SAGAR) as a “creed” that India aims to follow to better connect
with its "land and maritime partners to the east." Through SAGAR, which
was announced in 2015, India aims to work towards cooperation, sustenance and
peaceful development in the region.
India-Indonesia:
Evolving Convergence
Evidently, there exists a robust convergence in Indian
and Indonesian regional outlooks and strategies as was the case during the Non-alignment
Movement era. Modi's vision of a free and open Indo-Pacific and Natalegawa’s
conceptualisation of “Dynamic Equilibrium” (which Jokowi has carried forward)
are complementary. Both share a common objective of developing cooperative power
structures as opposed to hegemony. This
convergence has led to the adoption of the “Shared Vision
on Maritime Cooperation in the Indo-Pacific” by the two countries. Among
other objectives, this “Shared Vision,” envisions “strengthening their maritime
cooperation for promotion of peace, stability and bringing in robust economic
growth and prosperity to the Indo-Pacific region;” and fostering and upholding
a sovereignty and “freedom of navigation and overflight.” The congruity in
their respective strategies for the Indo-Pacific seems to have strengthened the
case for mutual reliability. This is evidenced in the formulation of an
India-Indonesia ‘Comprehensive Strategic Partnership' and the bilateral
arrangement pertaining to Indonesia’s Sabang port – both of which were announced
alongside the “Shared Vision.”
Looking
Ahead
For India, its active outreach in Southeast Asia has
allowed it to present itself as a regional power capable of balancing prevailing
dominant powers in the region. However, China, with its
ambitious Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), remains a power to be reckoned with. Specifically,
Beijing has been Jakarta’s largest trading partner since 2013, and in 2016, became
the largest market for the latter’s exports. Today, China is Indonesia's third
largest source of foreign capital.
That said, Indonesia’s stance on the BRI is
intriguing. For instance, Panjaitan, also doubles as Indonesia's envoy for the
BRI. Moreover, though Jakarta has pitched its GMF as an alternative to Beijing’s
BRI, it has also signed five cooperation contracts worth US$ 23.3 billion under
the BRI and is offering new projects worth up to US$ 60 billion to Chinese
investors.
Meanwhile, although India and Indonesia have regularly
emphasised on their desire to enhance ties in spheres such as economy, the pace
of follow-up has been slow. To harness the prevailing momentum in bilateral
relations, India must focus on strengthening its economic engagement with Indonesia
because its investment in the latter remains minimal. More importantly, the
need of the hour is for both countries to optimise implementation strategies
and timelines of their numerous congruent plans for a free, rule-based and
equitable Indo-Pacific.