Indo-Nepal Relations: Differing Perspective

25 Jun, 2001    ·   509

Brig. SP Sinha laments the short-sighted and insensitive policy towards Nepal and calls for a radical change in Indian attitude towards Nepal


In recent years there have been perceptible strains in Indo-Nepal relations. The growth of the ISI’s activities in Nepal detrimental to India ’s internal security has caused great concern and alarm not only in the Government circles but also amongst the general public of India . The hijack of an Indian Airlines passenger aircraft, IC-814, in Dec, 99, with the connivance of ISI agents in Nepal when flying from Kathmandu to New Delhi has confirmed Indian fears that Pakistan is using Nepal as a base for its anti-India activities. The hijack was followed by another alarming incident triggered by rumours in Kathmandu that Hrithik Roshan, a popular Indian movie star had made disparaging remarks about Nepal and its people. The rumours spread like wild fire causing anti-Indian riots at several places in Nepal . It later turned out that the movie star had never made the remarks attributed to him. The complicity of ISI agents in Nepal in the spread of these rumours has since been established. 

 

 

There is growing perception in India that Nepal has not adequately reciprocated its traditional friendship. This view has been strengthened by Nepal ’s penchant for playing the China card in its relations with India . More and more people in India are veering round the view that Nepal has been unmindful of India ’s legitimate security concerns and has unwillingly or otherwise played into Beijing ’s hand. Lately there has been serious concern about an emerging China-ISI nexus in Nepal . In short, many Indians see Nepal ’s attitude as one of extracting concessions without meeting its obligations.

 

 

There is also a different perspective on India-Nepal relations. I would argue that the Indian attitude and its insensitivity to Nepal ’s concerns has primarily fuelled anti-Indian sentiments. Let me add here that anti-Indian feelings are centered mainly in and around Kathmandu Valley and a few other urban centers. I would further argue that the demographic profile of the Terai region of Nepal and its relationship with Uttar Pradesh and Bihar holds the key to India-Nepal relations. Unfortunately, people sitting in Delhi have defined our Nepal policy rather that people who physically share the Indo-Nepal border.

 

 

Nepal ’s Terai region has a mixed demographic profile. As per the 1981 census of Nepal , linguistic groups consisting of Maithili (11%) Bhojpuri (7.6%) and Awadhi (1.6%) constituted nearly 20% of the terai population. As per the same census, the Terai region had more than 92% of all immigrants to Nepal . In the 1991 Nepali census the Great Himalayas and the Middle Mountains together accounted for 53% of total population. On the other hand, the Terai which had only 35% of the total population in 1952-54 Nepali census, increased its share to 47% in 1991 census. The higher population growth in the Tarai compared with the rest of Nepal is seen in part as a result of migration from India . The Nepalese see their trend as Indian Lebensraum (living space). It is easy to argue that more Nepalese migrate to India than Indians to Nepal , but when one considers that the population of Nepal is a more 24 million as compared to India ’s 1000 million (UP-139m, Bihar-86m), the Nepalese fear is justified. Exacerbating this scenario is also the fact that Bhojpuri, Maithili and Avadhi speaking Nepali citizens of Terai have yet to develop deep emotional links in Nepal .

 

 

Another trend resented in Nepal is the increase in female Nepali immigration in the last decade. Poor Nepali girls have been lured into the sex trade in major cosmopolitan cities of India . The girls who return to Nepal spread AIDS in the population and place a heavy burden on Nepal ’s meager services.

 

 

Much publicity has been given to the criminal-ISI nexus operating from Nepal . Much has also been made of sprouting Madarassas along the India-Nepal border. Rather that putting all the blame on the Nepalese government the major share of the blame must be placed on the governments of the UP and Bihar . Most of the criminal activities along India-Nepal border take place with the connivance of police, civil and customs officials of Bihar and UP. They are corrupt, inefficient, ill trained, callous and have developed vested interest in criminal activities on the border. Illegal Bangladeshi migrants who have settled down in the border districts of UP and Bihar have facilitated proliferation of Madarassas. 

 

 

Yet another example of India ’s insensitivity to Nepal ’s concerns is the construction of Laxmanpur efflux bund over the River near the UP-Nepal border without informing or consulting Nepal . The bund has caused inundation of Nepalese territory and thousands had to be evacuated. 

 

 

Although still poor and underdeveloped like many parts of India , Nepal today is a country of talented people, conscious of their identity and fiercely independent. Young Nepalese join the Indian Army and fight for India ’s sovereignty and integrity and yet, we choose to demonize them. There cannot be a greater contradiction than this. 

 

 

 

POPULAR COMMENTARIES