Indo-US Relations in the New Millenium

12 Jan, 2000    ·   303

Arvind Kumar argues that both India and the US converge on nuclear disarmament then most of the irritants between them would be diminished


Two of the recent events or actions of the United States have again sparked off a new debate among analysts on the futureof Indo-US relations. The de-listing of 51 Indian entities from the US sanctions list is a good development and siignals that the US wants to revamp its policy towards India . These Indian companies and institutions can now acquire American expertise in "non-sensitive areas" without special export licenses  The punitive list was, in effect, a broad trade embargo against companies and agencies with little or no direct connection to nuclear weapons programme. However, the waiving of  embargo  may also help US firms and research organisations that had ties with the Indian institutions and companies.  There is also a possibility that the US may reduce the entities list further. It is to be noted that the US has not de-listed any of the Pakistani entities from their sanctions lists, which  is a significant development.

 

 

The other recent event is that the US has acknowledged that India can have a minimum nuclear deterrent "at the level it chooses". This statement came at a time when the Vajpayee government has been trying to forge a consensus in the country for signing the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT). There is no doubt about the quantum shift in the US policy towards India . Last fortnight only, Mr. John Holum, who is the senior most Clinton administration official dealing with non-proliferation and disarmamentissues stated that the US has not accepted the idea that India needs to have a credible minimum nuclear deterrent,and that Indias security requirements were best served without a nuclear capability.

 

 

This indicates a clear shift in the US position. Beginning with a demand for a roll-back and capping of India 's nuclear facilities, the US has started accepting that India has a right to determine its minimum deterrent requirement. This may also be the first indication that the US is willing to consider Indias claim to nuclear weapon status. It is ironical that despite going overtly nuclear, neither India nor Pakistan is technically part of the exclusive nuclear club. It now seems now that the US may take serious note and try best to amend the 1968 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). The need of the hour is for India to persist with US for its entry into the nuclear club. However, for all practical purposes, India is a nuclear weapon state.These positive developments  at the end of the twentieth century would herald a new beginning in the chapter of Indo-US relations in the new millennium. A country decides its own national security interests and hence the US understands that the minimum deterrent (of nuclear and/ or thermonuclear weapons and missiles, and other means of delivery) would change according to Indias own perception of its changing security environment. Earlier, the US had asked India to define its minimum nuclear deterrent in terms of numbers.

 

 

India is also showing its willingness to sign the CTBT which is a major irritant between the two countries. The US, despite knowing that it has a problem itself in getting American Senate approval for the CTBT's ratification, has been pressurising  India for signing it  without any conditions. It has already made clear to the US   that India would sign the treaty if all political parties agree. However, the Prime Minister Mr. Atal Behari Vajpayee had made it clear while addressing the United Nations General Assembly last year that India wont come in the way of CTBT implementation. There is also no risk involved for India in signing the CTBT because it has successfully conducted nuclear tests in May 1998 and collected sufficient data for computer simulation testing done for refining nuclear weapons in the laboratories. If India thinks it is in the country's interests to sign the CTBT, it would go ahead and sign it with an executive order and without seeking consensus at this juncture.

 

 

The other positive factor in the relationship between the two countries at the dawn of the new millennium is the change in the perceptions and attitudes of the key policy makers both in India and the US . The US is seeking a trustworthy partner in South Asia after experimenting with Pakistan for so many years which has not  paid them the dividends which they expected. The US has come to a conclusion that India has great potential to be a trustworthy  ally.

 

 

The new millennium should see both countries,  adopt more pragmatic, specific, politically feasible policies which would help in forging and paving the way for a new relationship that would usher in closer cooperation in every field including commerce and economy. The most essential requirement in the new century would be to bring greater transparency in the field of nuclear technologies and nonproliferation policies. India has a very good track record of maintaining strict voluntary restraint on export of nuclear technology, equipment and related materials. The US should share its knowledge related to science and technology with India . Both countries should also work together in the new millennium for achieving a nuclear weapon free world. If the two nations converge on this single point of nuclear disarmament then most of the irritants between them would be diminished. 

 

 

 

POPULAR COMMENTARIES