Macau: A stop on the way to Taiwan

31 Dec, 1999    ·   301

Sonika Gupta analyses the impact of the handover of Macau to China


With the handover of Macau , the Peoples Republic of China moves a step closer to its eventual goal of reunification. Macau is the oldest colony in the world and its peaceful return to the Chinese fold after nearly 4 and half centuries of Portugese rule reaffirms the Chinese commitment to reunification. In keeping with the one- nation- two-systems principle, the Chinese government will not disturb the essentially profit- oriented economy of Macau . Infact, the population of Macau , plagued with incessant gang wars may well welcome a stricter maintenance of law and order by the new government. As in Hong Kong , the local administration in Macau too, shall be overhauled by Beijing , fostering a close adherence to central political directives. 

 

 

The handover of Macau is significant for broader political reasons. In fact, both Hong Kong and Macau are warm ups leading to the big event-the reunification of Taiwan . Though the transfer of both HK and Macau were peaceful and negotiated through international agreements; that they eventually became part of the PRC is significant for China . In both cases, China has displayed a pragmatic attitude by stating its an intention not to tamper with the existing economic structures. On the other hand, the issue of political control was not negotiated in HK and presumably would not be negotiated in Macau either. The Party is and shall remain omnipresent. Economic pragmatism is what Beijing offers Taiwan as an assurance in the event of reunification; but the political dominance of the CCP makes reunification almost an impossible choice for Taiwan to make.

 

 

Beijing would like to project HK and Macau as examples for Taiwan to follow, but there can be no comparison between the different situations.  HK or Macau never competed in the international arena to gain recognition as the “real China ”.  “Reunification” for all practical purposes would imply signing over of  the national sovereignty of Taiwan to the PRC.  The people of either HK or Macau did not enjoy sovereign rights. HK  and Macau were both, expressly, colonies of the Western nations. The British, before leaving HK, hastily imported liberal-democratic institutions to the island and later raised up a hue and cry about the strangulation  of the democratic rights of the people of HK when Beijing altered the membership of the Legislative Council in HK to suit its requirements. 

 

 

Taiwan , however, is a different story. In words of the Taiwanese President, Lee Teng-hui,  “The Chinese nation was divided in 1949, when the PRC was proclaimed. Taiwan cannot cause national disintegration, because the Chinese nation was already divided. There is no need to warn against Taiwan declaring independence because the Republic of China has been sovereign and independent since its founding in 1912.” Further, “democratic development in Taiwan has now reached the point of no return.”  China has always insisted that it shall keep open the option to use force in pursuing its objective of reunifying Taiwan . No similar proclamation was needed or made either in the case of HK or Macau . It is the use of uncompromising rhetoric compounded by the military exercises by Beijing in the Taiwan Strait   that sets Taiwan apart from  earlier reunifications. 

 

 

Though the handover of Macau is not a highly significant event in itself, it nevertheless provides China with another opportunity to restate its position on reunification and to demonstrate to the world that it shall continue to pursue reunification as a national objective in face of overwhelming international opposition. Though the changes taking place in HK and Macau are an internal matter of China , their effect on Chinese foreign policy would be strengthening and significant.

 

 

However, one must keep in mind that the people of HK were in position to object to reunification and the people of Macau seem to be in no mood to do so; but the Taiwanese are in a position to protest and have done so ever since the founding of the PRC in 1949. Therefore, the real test of China ’s reunification objective lies not in making economic successes of HK and Macau under the one-nation-two-systems principle, but in getting support inside and outside Taiwan for an eventual reunification-and that would definitely not be possible under the present circumstances.

 

 

 

POPULAR COMMENTARIES