Of Tapes and Tapping Technical intelligence scores over human intelligence
02 Jul, 1999 · 217
Maj. Gen. Yashwant Deva (Retd) highlights how the Kargil Tapes have in addition to exposing the hollowness of Paksitan's politics also demostrated the virtuosity and preeminence of technical intelligence (Techint).
That intelligence is no more a cloak and dagger affair, should have dawned on us half a century back. We dithered in creating an integrated set-up for signal interception, satellite imagery, and making and breaking codes, because of the pressures from our sprawling network of spies and human analysts, led by a technically illiterate bureaucracy. The Indian establishment is loath to give signals intelligence (Sigint) its due, though time and again it saved the day lending the country a diplomatic or military edge. We have been largely dependent on humans. In this age of high-resolution satellite imagery, electronic surveillance and virtual intelligence, we brag of obtaining early warning of the enemy intrusion from gujjars and sheep grazers?
For more than a decade and a half, I have been harping that
The country needs an intelligence organization similar to the National Security Agency (NSA), pooling all its assets of signal intelligence, cryptography and cryptanalysis. It should be under the MOD as in the
Sigint is expensive. Both the hardware and software cost a lot. Whereas one can understand difficulties in obtaining state of the art equipment and appreciate dependence of indigenous R&D on dual use technologies that attract denial regimes, neglect of software development is inexcusable in view of our proven expertise in this field. More than resources, it is a question of mindset. Had we continued to pay attention to Sigint, Rajiv Gandhi’s murder could have been prevented.
Lastly, let us remember that intelligence and security are two sides of the same coin. The Pak military is disconcerted by our smartness and would exploit chinks in our communications security (Comsec). I quote George Oswell, who wrote in 1984, "Any sound that Winston made above the level of a very low whisper, would be picked up by it … There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being watched at any given moment … you had to live -- did live, from habit that became instinct -- in the assumption that every sound you made was overheard and, except in darkness, every movement scrutinized."
I hope the other George is listening.