Home Contact Us
Search :
   
Military - Articles
Print Bookmark Email Post Comment
#1973, 19 March 2006
India: Budgeting for Defence
Bhartendu Kumar Singh
Indian Defence Accounts Service

The Finance Minister's dream budget has come as a dampener to the defence services. Against double digit expectations, the defence budget is up merely by 7.23 percent to Rs. 89,000 crore. This is insignificant due to inflation, rise in salaries and swelling ammunitions cost. Add to it the sustained double digit hike in the Chinese defence budget this year (almost 15 percent) and the situation becomes dim. While there is nothing wrong in bargaining for more to overcome budgetary constraints, the immediate challenge before the services is to manage the available resources in the best possible manner.

The first area for fiscal introspection is underutilization of budget and the tendency to surrender funds. In fact, except for the financial year 2004-05, funds were mostly surrendered. For example, between 1999-04, Rs. 32,740 crore meant for capital expenditure lapsed due to non-fructification of defence modernization efforts. This year also, around 1000 crore meant for capital expenditure remained unspent. Parliament's Standing Committee on Defence has been, in fact, critical of this tendency. If, therefore, the Finance Minister has not been generous this time, he could not be faulted. There is urgent need for better synchronization between the services on the one hand and the MoD including Defence Finance on the other. The defence budget needs to be scientifically forecasted, monitored and controlled. Tools such as financial information system and triennial reviews of commitments/ obligations instead of present biannual reviews could ensure effective monitoring of the defence funds.

Optimum utilization of the budget also requires a reorientation of the capital expenditure. Presently, each service projects its own requirements unmindful of the needs of the sister services. Often, this leads to bargaining and pressure situations. Then, there are previous contractual commitments. Very little funds are left in every budget to drive fresh thinking on modernization. Hence, there is a need to focus on intra-service and inter-service prioritization of acquisitions and projects. Joint planning and budgeting processes need to be institutionalized and strengthened to ensure optimal and effective use of available resources. The Group of Ministers' Report on National Security that had recommended a long term defence perspective plan (LTDPP) through a rigorous process of intra-service and inter-service prioritization deserves a sympathetic consideration. Other initiatives like timely approval of five year defence plans, formulation of a priority procurement plan and long term fund commitments from the Ministry of Finance can ensure better fiscal management of the defence budget.

Bringing down the revenue expenditure would be another step that will leave more funds under capital head. Though the revenue head in the present defence budget has come down by 1.5 percent compared to last year's budget, this has taken place because of a higher capital outlay (Rs. 37,458 crore). The truth is that revenue expenditure accounts for almost three fifth of the defence budget and is rising (by around 3000 crore this year). Part of the reason is that the Army is still manpower intensive. While all over the world manpower is being reduced, the tendency in Indian Army is otherwise. There is enormous space for bringing down this manpower and reduce revenue expenditure.

Budget funds could also be best utilized through new macro control mechanisms such as zero based budgeting, programme budgeting and performance budgeting. There is also space for improved inventory management and control. Availability of online updated real - time inventory information relating to various equipments needs to be ensured by the services. Purchase of new items, wherever possible, should be done on the basis of rate contract prescribed by Directorate General of Supplies and Disposal (DGS&D). Even though the rates are often high than the prevailing market rates, this would ensure speedier decision making and procurement on advantageous terms.

Actually, to streamline the defence revenue expenditure, the government has come out with comprehensive delegation of financial powers at all levels. The competent financial authority (CFA) at every level shall benefit from on-the-spot advice of the integrated financial advisors (IFAs). Unfortunately, the IFA system has not boiled down to all levels. The IFAs are 'necessary evil' for expenditure management and should be institutionalized and strengthened. In addition, the IFAs can suggest their CFA for local resource mobilization and revenue generation given the fact that defence forces have huge assets and properties that can be put to good use without compromising canons of national security or combat capability of the services.

The present defence budget must have come as a disappointment to modernization plans and objectives of the defence forces. But let us not forget, Rs. 89,000 crore is not a mean amount. Before asking for more, all tools of modern financial management must be applied in executing this huge amount. Comprehensive budgetary reforms are required as a permanent solution to get the best value for money.

(The Views expressed are Author's Own)

 
Article by same Author
Chinese Military 'Website' : Possible Interpretations
China's 'Stride 2009' and India
Beyond the Chinese fantasy: Will India Disintegrate?
Negotiating with China
Taking China Seriously
Clamour over the Henderson Brooks Report: Missing the Wood for the Trees?
Does China Matter? Elections and Foreign Policy Issues in India
China and the Politics of UN Peacekeeping
Has India's Military Diplomacy Come of Age?
China, India and the Red Star over Nepal
China, India and the Tibet Crisis
China's Emergence as India's Largest Trade Partner
The Indian Prime Minister's Visit to China
The Kunming Joint Military Exercises and Sino-Indian Relations
Whither China's Democratic Transition?
Ideology, Foreign Policy and the Rhetoric of Anti-Americanism
Bullets vs. Ballots: Foreign Policy Decision-Making in China and India
India, China and the Prospects of Asian Economic Community
Beyond the Nuclear Deal: India, China and the Asian Balance of Power
Military Diplomacy and Sino-Indian Relations
SAARC Expansion and China
Hu's Visit to Russia and Sino-Russian Relations
Interpreting China's Defence Budget
Hu's Visit to Africa and Implications for India
Whither China's defence?
China, India and the Race for Soft Power
Hu's Visit: A Post-script
India, China and Asian Security
China Comes Closer
Hu Jintao's visit to America: Why did it fail?
Reorienting defence expenditure
China: Great Power, Grand Projects
India, China & the Politics of Regionalism
Will China become a democracy?
Consolidating India's Military-Industrial complex
China's Military Modernization & India's Preparedness
Sino-Indian relations: Economy over Politics?
Estimating China's defence expenditure
Debating Defence Expenditure
China: Democracy, Development and International Relations
China's Japan Challenge
George Fernandes and Sino-Indian Relations
Asia after Iraq
Chinese Perspectives on the Kashmir Dispute
Fearing a Chinese nuclear attack in Arunachal Pradesh
Why is China so Ambiguous?
Agni-II: A watered down response from China
Religious Organisations in Tibet: A Profile
Musharraf's Visit to China
Chinese Views on the Kargil Conflict
Sino-Indian Ties: The 11th Round of Joint Working Group Meeting
Li Peng's Visit to Pakistan: An Analysis
China - Pakistan Relations : Post Chagai

 
ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
 
View comment(0)
POST Your Comment
No comment for this article
 
Print Bookmark Email
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
B 7/3 Lower Ground Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029, INDIA.
Tel: 91-11-4100 1900, 4165 2556, 4165 2557, 4165 2558, 4165 2559 Fax: (91-11) 41652560
Email:
© Copyright 2010, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.
            Web Design : India Internet